JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 1, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Rodolfo Lozano Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo De Choco Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Choco. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo De Choco
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo
  • Competencia del superior jerárquico común
Acción De Tutela
  • Deber de designar conjueces por impedimento de magistrados del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Derecho A La Impugnacion Fallo De Tutela
  • Incumplimiento por magistrados del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de orden perentoria de dar trámite a la acción de tutela
Derecho De Acceso A La Administración De Justicia
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo del Chocó en conflicto de competencia
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, en ejercicio de sus atribuciones constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Rodolfo Lozano Diaz al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Choco para que la tramite en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.